Bill Dawbin Postdoctoral Fellowship 2012: Guidelines

Objectives

The objectives of this Fellowship scheme are to:

  1. build a stronger scientific base for cetacean policy and conservation in the Australasian region
  2. deepen the pool of academic expertise about cetaceans
  3. contribute to cetacean research efforts for the global public good
  4. contribute to cetacean research, conservation and management issues

Research Priorities

The Fellowship is targeted at national goals which are closely aligned to the Australian Government’s National Research Priorities and the Australian Marine Mammal Centre’s Research Priorities relating to cetaceans.

National Science Research Priorities

National Science Research Priorities [PDF]

  • An Environmentally Sustainable Australia
  • Promoting and Maintaining Good Health
  • Frontier Technologies for Building and Transforming Australian Industries
  • Safeguarding Australia

The AMMC Research Priorities

The AMMC research priorities (not in priority order) will guide the assessment of applications submitted.

Research Priority 1

Quantify population status, structure, distribution, habitat use and ecological influences for cetacean populations for which such data can demonstrably inform and improve conservation management:

  • Continue, improve and standardise long-term abundance and trend estimation
  • Improve and apply genetic tools and principles to answer practical questions in cetacean ecology, evolution, conservation and genetics, where they are directly linked to cetacean conservation management.
  • Improve and apply methods that identify patterns of habitat use and which aim to evaluate relative importance of different habitats to defined behaviours (e.g. migration, resting, feeding, calving)

Research Priority 2

Characterise and quantify threats to cetacean populations, with a focus on understanding the nature and extent of interactions with humans such as:

  • the interactions between cetaceans and noise
  • cetaceans -fisheries interactions: Operational
  • cetaceans -fisheries interactions: Ecological
  • cetaceans and aquaculture
  • cetaceans and habitat degradation
  • environmental influences on cetacean health
  • the interactions between cetaceans and vessels

Research Priority 3

Develop risk management and mitigation tools/strategies for cetacean and human interactions and test their efficacy

Research Priority 4

Develop powerful, new, non-lethal, minimally invasive, technologies and methodologies (e.g. molecular, bio-logging, remote sensing) that best address the above objectives

Research Priority 5

Scientific research which supports the development, review and implementation of Recovery or Threat Abatement Plans prepared under the EPBC Act, or which supports other agreed recovery actions, for listed Australian cetacean species

Fellowship Funding

The fellowship will be $96,800 annual salary GST inclusive and annual project funding of $50,000 GST inclusive for a period of three years.

Proposals that include co-investment in the stipend and/or project funding will be favourably considered.

Funding Rules

Eligibility

The postdoctoral fellow must have a PhD.

The Fellowship supports research by investigators based at the following Australian organisations:

  • universities;
  • university-funded staff in Cooperative Research Centres ( CRC);
  • other tertiary education institutions;
  • State museums and State-funded institutions; and
  • bodies subject to the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997 (eg. CSIRO).

Applicants must provide evidence that if successful their fellowship will be hosted by an appropriate Australian organisation. A description of the support provided by the host institution should also be provided.

Applicants may have already commenced their postdoctoral studies. Postdoctoral fellows must be less than 5 years since graduating from a PhD. Academic transcript detailing date of PhD or MD graduation must be provided.

Applicants will not be eligible for an Award if an ethics approval is required for the project activity and that approval has not been obtained. Evidence of ethics approval must be provided by the time of commencement of the award.

Overseas institutions and researchers are not eligible to apply unless the overseas researchers are employed on a full-time basis at an Australian organisation.

Stipend and Allowances

The Fellowship is valued at an annual rate of $96,800 for three years. Co-investment in the stipend by the host university/organisation or another funding body will be considered favourably.

Project activity funding

In addition to the salary component applicants can apply for up to $50,000 per annum to fund the project activity. A detailed budget and justification will be required. Co-contribution by the host university / organisation or another funding body will be considered favourably.

Project activity costs may be funded from other sources but details of any obligations imposed by other funding bodies must be communicated to the AMMC.

Fellowship for 2012

Timelines

Key dates for the round are:

Application stage Date
Call for applications 10 January 2012
Applications close 21 February 2012
Assessment by National Marine Mammal Scientific Committee March 2012
Notification of results 30 April 2012
Contract developed and signed 30 May 2012

While every effort will be made to comply with these dates, they are indicative only. Please refer to the AMMC web page1 for the most up to date information.

At the conclusion of the study, the recipient must present their research to the annual meeting of the National Marine Mammal Scientific Committee.

Tenure

The award is for a period of three years, conditional on a satisfactory progress report twelve months into the Award. A twelve monthly report will be required for each year of tenure. The report must be emailed to the Coordinator, Australian Marine Mammal Centre (AMMC) followed by a signed hard copy.

Following completion of the project, a full report is to be submitted to the National Marine Mammal Scientific Committee with copies of publications and abstracts included.

Selection Criteria

Quality and Relevance of the Project

The primary assessment criterion for a Fellowship is the scientific quality and impact, and the relevance of the project being proposed. The research must be clearly aligned with National and AMMC’s research priorities.

The research priorities are sufficiently broad to allow most research projects to establish some linkage to one or more priorities, but applicants should note that strong preference will be given to projects that:

  • propose analyses of existing, valuable but under-utilised or unpublished datasets
  • addresses a gap in knowledge likely to contribute directly to a conservation or management challenge
  • demonstrate how the research outcomes directly inform management and policy priorities
  • demonstrate how the research outcomes might lead to improved cetacean conservation outcomes, particularly for substantial threatening processes and/or for threatened species
  • are collaborative and maximise co-investment opportunities

Quality of the Applicant

The quality of the applicant is also critical to the assessment of a Fellowship. This applies to the applicant’s track record of publications or abstracts, awards and achievements, extracurricular expertise such as scientific membership, administrative expertise, and work experience in research.

Prospects

The potential of the proposed project to support the directions of AMMC to deliver outcomes that are relevant is essential. Also important are the broader prospects of the nature and value of the benefits of the deliverables from the project, and in particular whether it will help the AMMC achieve its major national goals.

Assessment

Applications are assessed by the National Marine Mammal Scientific Committee (NMMSC) against the following criteria:

Project Criteria Weighting
1 Is the intrinsic scientific value of the project of a high standard?

0 Not demonstrated

1 Low scientific value

2 Useful/basic scientific value

3 Good scientific value

4 Very good scientific value

5 Excellent/innovative scientific value

2 How well will the scientific research outcomes directly inform management and policy priorities?

0 Not addressed

1 Poorly addressed

2 Reasonably addressed

3 Well addressed

4 Very well addressed

5 Excellently addressed

3 Does the project address a gap in knowledge or a conservation or management challenge?

0 Not addressed

1 Poorly addressed

2 Reasonably addressed

3 Well addressed

4 Very well addressed

5 Excellently addressed

4 Is the project a major analysis of existing datasets?

0 No

1 A minor analysis

2 A useful analysis

3 A major analysis

5 Is a Postdoctoral stipend the most effective mechanism to conduct this work?

0 No

1 Yes

6 Is the project value for money?

0 Not demonstrated

1 Low value for money

2 Reasonable value

3 Good value for money

4 Very good value for money

5 Excellent value for money

Desirable: Is there co-investment in the project funding?

0 No

1 Yes

Total out of 25
Applicant Criteria
1

Do you consider the applicant’s track record of publications or abstracts, awards and achievements, extracurricular expertise such as scientific membership, administrative expertise, and work experience in research demonstrates that the applicant is capable of conducting the research and publishing the results?

0 Not demonstrated

1 Poor record

2 Reasonable record

3 Good record

4 Very good record

5 The applicant has an excellent track record relevant to the proposed work

Desirable: Is there co-investment in the stipend funding

0 No

1 Yes

Total out of 6

Following the evaluation of all eligible applications, the NMMSC make a recommendation to the International Whale and Marine Mammal Conservation and Initiatives (IWMMCI) Steering Committee. The IWMMCI Steering Committee will then recommend to the Minister for SEWPaC, the projects to be funded. Once approved by the Minister the Parties enter into a Funding Agreement, and successful projects are funded. These assessments will be based on the assessed relative merit of the proposal against the funding round assessment criteria, the potential impact of the proposed research project, and the assessed relative importance in terms of relevant current whole-of-government priorities.

Universities/organisations and applicants will be advised of the successful Fellowship holders as soon as the results are known.

Conflict of Interest

Committee members and staff members are required to divulge any Conflict of Interest in relation to:

  • any financial interest in the grant applicants or applications;
  • any relatives or friends with a financial interest in the grant applicants or applications;
  • any personal bias or inclination which would affect a decision in relation to grant applicants or applications; and
  • any personal obligation, allegiance or loyalty which would in any way affect a decision in relation to the grant program

If any Conflict of Interest applies the Committee member and staff members will not assess the relevant application.

Applicants are required to declare as part of their application, existing conflicts of interest or that to the best of their knowledge there is no conflict of interest, including in relation to the examples below, that would impact on or prevent the applicant from proceeding with the project or any funding agreement it may enter into with the Australian Government.

Where an applicant subsequently identifies that an actual, apparent, or potential conflict of interest exists or might arise in relation to this application for funding, the applicant must inform the department in writing immediately.

A conflict of interest may exist, for example, if the applicant or any of its personnel:

  • Has a relationship (whether professional, commercial or personal) with a party who is able to influence the application assessment process, such as a department staff member;
  • Has a relationship with, or interest in, an organisation, which is likely to interfere with or restrict the applicant in carrying out the proposed activities fairly and independently; or
  • Has a relationship with, or interest in, an organisation from which they will receive personal gain as a result of the granting of funding under the [Insert program name] program.

Reporting and Accountability

Annual Report

The Fellow will provide an annual progress report to the AMMC Coordinator following endorsement by the Fellow’s supervisor in the host university/organisation. The report should be emailed to the AMMC Coordinator followed by a signed hard copy at the same time it is provided to the university/organisation supervisor.

Responsibilities

The Fellow and their supervisor will be required to report to the AMMC on project deliverables at intervals necessary to satisfy internal government reporting requirements.

Funding agreements

The funding agreement will define the term of the Fellow’s involvement in undertaking the project and the reporting requirements of the university/organisation. In exceptional circumstances, there will be some opportunity for negotiation of conditions.

A Sample Funding Agreement [PDF] is available for information purposes.

Details of the Fellowship awarded will be published on the department's website within 7 working days of signing the funding agreement.

Administration of the Fellowship

The award recipient must be undertaking work within a host university department, research institute or other approved institute. The financial administration of the award will be through the appropriate finance office of the organisation.

Intellectual Property and Publication

Intellectual Property Rights in Activity Material vest immediately in the host Organisation (but without affecting the position between the Organisation and a third party).

The Organisation grants to the Commonwealth a permanent, irrevocable, free, world-wide, non-exclusive licence (including a right of sub-licence) to use, reproduce, adapt and exploit the Intellectual Property Rights in Activity Material (which includes Research Outputs) and Existing Material for any purpose, including a Commercial purpose.

Further information on Intellectual Property is available on the Sample Funding Agreement [PDF], Clause 12.

Financial and Reporting Obligations

Each Fellowship will be managed as a separate project with its own budget, milestones, and end date.

It is the responsibility of the host university/organisation to ensure that a financial report is provided to AMMC detailing the annual expenditure of funds for the Fellowship.

Publications

Any publications (papers or conference abstracts) derived from the project must acknowledge the financial support of the AMMC.

Contact

For further information on the Bill Dawbin Postdoctoral Fellowship please contact:

Ms Renata Robertson
Coordinator, AMMC
Australian Antarctic Division
203 Channel Highway
Kingston TAS 7050

Phone: 03 6232 3247

Email: ammccoordinator@aad.gov.au


[1] www.marinemammals.gov.au